Policy Matters

Policy Areas
Budget & Tax
Predatory Lending
Income & Working Families
Mississippi Economic Recovery Resources
Basic Economic Security
Basic Economic Security Calculator
MEPC Conference
Hodding Carter III Keynote Speech
2011 Annual Policy Conference
Dick Molpus Keynote Speech
2010 Conference Presentations
2009 Conference Presentations
Governor Winter Speech on Economy
Press Releases
Sign up for E-mail Updates

Share |

2011 Annual Policy Conference Recap

October 26, 2011

The 2011 Annual Policy Conference was a great success. Thank you to everyone who attended and the presenters who shared their knowledge and expertise. This year, MEPC expanded our break out session format to allow participants to attend two sessions.

Darrin Webb, opened the conference with an overview of Mississippi’s economy and Bobby Harrison, Capitol Correspondent for the North East Mississippi Daily Journal and Emily Wagster-Pettus, Associated Press political reporter served as respondents to the presentation, offer insight on how the changing political landscape will affect efforts to engage policy makers on issues affecting working families.

Our keynote luncheon address focused on the importance of the role of government in the lives of  all Americans and the need for various constituencies to work together for a more prosperous Mississippi. Video of our Keynote Speaker, Hodding Carter III, Professor of Leadership and Public Policy University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill will also be available soon on our website so check back!

Below are brief descriptions of our 2011 Breakout Sessions:

Taxes fund the public structures that make up the foundation of our economy and make job creation possible.

  • MEPC Senior Policy Analyst Sara Miller and Elaine Mejia Senior Program Associate with Public Works at Demos present tax reform options and how to talk about taxes effectively in the current political landscape.

Understanding the challenges and opportunities of health care reform implementation

  • Corey Wiggins with i-Think Group examine the ongoing efforts of health reform implementation in Mississippi and how those opportunities and challenges affect the lives of working Mississippians.

Measuring basic economic security in Mississippi and building pathways for working families to achieve it

  • Wider Opportunity for Women’s Delese Harvey explores the new benchmark for basic economic security and gives hands on guidance on how organizations can use the Basic Economic Security Tables to advocate for programs that support families in their community or to help adults budget and set goals as they re-enter the workforce.

Steps to help Mississippi’s working families protect and build assets

  • Mississippi Center for Justice Community Organizer, Alicia Netterville and Felicia Lyles, VP Regional Branch Administrator for Hope Credit Union explain the effects of payday lending and how working families can make responsible financial decisions and move toward economic security.

PDF versions of all the PowerPoint presentations given in each break out session at the conference.

Excerpts from “Making Mississippi Competitive: Solutions For Building Assets In Low-Wealth Communities”

April 22, 2011

Supporting policies that promote and protect the accumulation of assets
One of the often overlooked strategies for challenging the long-standing grip of poverty in Mississippi includes support for policies that promote and protect the accumulation of assets among the state’s working families.
Assets allow families to avert financial disaster following an emergency, to pursue the stability of homeownership, or to increase future earnings of the next generation through a college education.  On the other hand, the absence of assets or savings can leave families in situations where they need to rely on high-cost alternative financial services.
Absent an inheritance, building assets requires an income, a basic understanding of personal finance and a vehicle to save. Notably, Mississippi has a high prevalence of low-wage work – exacerbating the challenge of saving.  Through the right mix of workforce supports and development, financial education/training and tax policy, Mississippi has the opportunity to increase the amount of money that working families take home and to equip them with the tools to build wealth and their communities by strengthening the tax base.

At the same time, a strategy to promote asset development must also be buttressed by efforts to protect asset accumulation. Depository institutions, such as credit unions and banks, need to have options for low- income working families to save. In the absence of affordable options, families rely on high-cost alternative financial service providers to pay bills and conduct transactions. As families pay more for financial services, less money is available to save or to go towards the purchase of more appreciable assets like a home or sending children to college.

The report includes three main sections.
 

First, the report provides an overview of asset levels and banking profiles in Mississippi.

Secondly, it examines the use and pricing of a range of alternative financial services (AFS). These include check cashers, payday lenders, title lenders and rent-to-own stores.

Finally, the report looks at a range of promising practices that both promote and protect asset development around the country. From these practices, several recommendations are presented for building asset development opportunities in Mississippi.

The methodology used to create the report can be found in the report appendix. 

 

 

New Report Released Today: “Making Mississippi Competitive: Solutions For Building Assets In Low-Wealth Communities”

April 20, 2011

A new report released today by MEPC in partnership with the Foundation for the Mid South finds that Mississippi’s net worth asset level is lower than 44 other states.  The net worth of a typical Mississippi household is only about $50,000, compared to the national average of approximately $88,000.

Across the state of Mississippi, families are working hard, but fail to make ends meet.  Low wage work and the absence of assets exacerbate an exceedingly tough environment for working families.  Assets, in particular, play a huge role in determining which families avert financial disaster during an emergency and which families move forward through homeownership, entrepreneurship or college education.

Yet, Mississippians face a number of obstacles in building assets.  A higher percentage of Mississippians lack a checking or savings account than anywhere else in the country.  In the absence of a relationship with a bank or credit union, families without retail accounts are relying on high cost financial services.  As families find that they are in situations where they must use high cost financial services, less money is available to save and build assets.

“Making Mississippi Competitive: Solutions For Building Assets In Low-Wealth Communities” suggests a variety of ways that bankers, policymakers and families can create an environment to facilitate saving among Mississippi’s working families that ultimately builds wealth.


Read the Full Report

MEPC Is Now On Facebook

April 5, 2011

We’re pleased to launch MEPC’s official Facebook page and we are excited about this opportunity to engage with those interested in public policy issues effecting our state and communities.


Join a community who share a common interest in the development and implementation of public policy with the ultimate goal of improving access to economic opportunity for all Mississippians.

Click on www.facebook.com/mississippieconomicpolicycenter and press the “Like” button to stay connected to the latest developments from MEPC. See you on Facebook!

Why Should Working Mississippians Pay More?

February 10, 2011

Filed under: Predatory Lending — admin @ 11:27 AM

Currently, negotiations are underway to craft a bill to reauthorize Mississippi’s payday lending law.  If proposed changes are approved, Mississippi will remain the most expensive state in the Southeast to get a payday loan.  The chart below illustrates how Mississippi’s fees compare to the fees paid by payday loan borrowers in the Southeastern States:

The chart raises the question – why should working Mississippians pay $50 for a payday loan when working families in Tennessee pay $30 for the exact same loan?  Given that the law does not sunset until July of 2012, lawmakers should vote no on HB455 and make meaningful changes in the next legislative session.

Author: Ed Sivak, Director MEPC
Source: MEPC analysis of information from the Financial Service Centers of America

Loan Splitting: How an Emergency Loan Can Become a Debt Trap

January 24, 2011

Filed under: Predatory Lending — admin @ 2:37 PM

On Friday, January 21, the Mississippi Senate enlarged a loophole in the original version of the House payday lending reauthorization legislation. 

Despite efforts to increase consumer protections by implementing a 28 day repayment period on larger payday loans, the current bill’s payday lending provisions allow lenders to get around the 28 day repayment term through a process called loan splitting.  The table below illustrates the proposed changes to payday loan repayment terms:

The “up to” language for smaller loans allows the loophole to exist:

While the fees paid on the two loans would drop slightly, the consumer protection provision of a 28-30 day repayment term is easily circumvented.  While there has been some discussion of a regulatory ruling requiring that multiple loans taken out simultaneously be considered one loan, Mississippi lacks the infrastructure to enforce this ruling at the time the loans are made. 

To enforce this law and to prevent borrowers from taking out multiple loans beyond legal limits, a statewide system, or database, is the single-most effective way to prevent emergency loans from turning into debt traps.  Thirteen states already use a statewide system to enforce responsible lending.

Author: Ed Sivak, Director MEPC

Missed Opportunity – Payday Lending Enforcement

January 19, 2011

Filed under: Predatory Lending — admin @ 9:00 AM

On January 18, the Mississippi House of Representatives voted down several amendments to a bill to reenact the Check Casher’s Act that would protect consumers.  Among the issues voted down included provisions to lower the APR to 36% and extend the repayment term to 90 days.  The House also voted down a provision to implement a statewide system to enforce the law before passing its updated version of the Check Casher’s Act.

Without a statewide system, or database, there is no way to track, in real time, whether or not a borrower has multiple loans or if a lender extends multiple loans.  Thirteen states have implemented statewide systems effectively including the southern states of Alabama, Florida, Kentucky, South Carolina and Virginia.

In Florida, the loading of historical transactions prior to database implementation showed that 16 percent of customers were out of compliance – they had multiple loans outstanding.

In the states that have implemented a database, appropriations have not been needed.  Lenders typically pay a fee of $0.50 – $1.00 per transaction which covers to costs of the system.

As the House bill moves to the Senate, a database represents an important tool to protect consumers, weed out bad actor lenders and enhance the efficiency of the regulatory infrastructure.  In its absence, the limited provisions to extend the repayment terms of payday loans to 30 days will remain unable to be enforced at the time of extending or receiving a loan.

Author: Ed Sivak, Director MEPC
Source: Florida Department of Banking

Understanding the Payday Loan Debt Trap

January 13, 2011

Filed under: Predatory Lending — admin @ 12:45 PM

Once a borrower takes out a payday loan, he or she could quickly find themselves in a situation where they need multiple payday loans to cover expenses.  Table 1 illustrates how a family could find themselves caught in the debt trap.  A family earning $35,000 a year receives approximately $1,344 every two weeks in take home pay.  After taking out a payday loan and repaying it with fees for a total of $365, the family has only $979 left to cover $1,107 in expenses.   

Still short, the family will either need to take out another payday loan or choose to skip paying certain bills.  On average, borrowers take out 8 payday loans per year.  A 36% rate cap in Mississippi with 90 days for repayment would allow working families to avoid the debt trap.

Author: Ed Sivak, Director MEPC

Listen to MEPC Director Ed Sivak Live at 5:05 on 97.3 FM (Jackson)

December 3, 2010

Ed Sivak will be a guest tonight at 5:05 p.m. on the radio show On Deadline hosted by Sid Salter.

Tune in to SuperTalk Mississippi ( find your local station) during your drive time to listen to MEPC Director, Ed Sivak discuss the most challenging economic issues currently facing Mississippi’s working families and explain the need for a balanced approach to the state budget crisis.

Learn more tonight at 5:05 p.m.. You can also listen online at http://www.supertalk.fm/Sid-Salter/5043194

To stay informed on policy issues effecting Mississippi’s working families go to www.mepconline.org, sign up for email updates, and subscribe to our RSS feed. 

Breakout Session Wrap Up: Predatory Lending in Mississippi

November 4, 2010

Payday loans have had a negative impact on working families and communities in Mississippi.  During the 2010 Annual Policy Conference, a breakout  session entitled “The High Cost of Being Poor: Lending Reform in Mississippi” focused on the types of borrowers most often using payday lending services and the effects those services have on the communities in which they operate.

One of the concepts discussed was the high prevalence of Mississippi’s underbanked population with low-incomes.  Underbanked means that an individual has a checking or savings account but relies on alternative financial services and has used non-bank money orders, non-bank check cashing services, payday loans, rent-to own agreements, or pawnshops at least once or twice a year or refund anticipation loans at least once in the past five years.
   

The finding helps explain one of the reasons why payday lenders tend to locate on main thoroughfares in or near
economically distressed areas – access to potential customers.  A number of local governments have expressed a desire to limit the number of check cashers due to the negative effects associated with high concentrations of those types of entities.  The city of Ridgeland, for example, restricted the location of check cashers, title lenders and pawn shops due to their “blighting effect.”  For more information on how to get involved with actions to reduce high cost lending in Mississippi readers can go to the website for the Mississippians for Fair Lending Coalition.

Source:  FDIC National Survey of Unbanked and Underbanked Households
Author: Ed Sivak, MEPC Director
Older Posts »