Budget & Tax « Policy Matters

Share |

Governor Bryant Releases FY 2013 Executive Budget Recommendation

February 2, 2012

Filed under: Budget & Tax — Tags: appropriations, budget, Department of Revenue, Governor Bryant, legislature, MAEP, Medicaid, Mississippi, Mississippi Adequate Education Program, schools districts, smart budget act, State Personnel Board, taxes — admin @ 8:26 AM

Earlier this week, Governor Bryant released his Executive Budget Recommendation for FY 2013. The budget is to provide guidance as the legislature creates the budget.

It will be considered by the legislature in addition to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee’s recommendation and Governor Barbour’s recommendation that was released last Fall.

Bryant’s budget has some good elements as well as some proposals that bring cause for concern. The key components of Governor Bryant’s recommendation are below:

Small Increase for Department of Revenue
Bryant recommends a small $5million increase for the Department of Revenue to fund auditors who will collect more in taxes. It is estimated that the $5 million increase will bring in over $10 million in revenue owed to the state. However, even with the increase, the Department is still recommended for funding at a level below even FY 2011 levels.

Reduced Use of One Time Funds and No New Revenue
Bryant recommends reduced use of so called “one time” special funds for recurring budget items. This budgeting recommendation would make budgeting more straightforward. However, Governor Bryant is opposed to raising taxes and would make up for the reduction in funds with a cuts-only approach.

Lump Sum Authority and State Personnel Board Waiver
Bryant recommends that agencies be given “lump sum” appropriations. Currently, funding is granted with certain amounts provided for specific budget line items, like personnel, travel, equipment , etc. “Lump Sum” appropriations would allow agencies to move funds across budget categories without legislative approval. Waiving State Personnel Board protections would allow agency directors to make personnel changes regardless of an employee’s state service status. State Personnel Board protections promote a public sector work environment free from undue political influence.

Implement Performance Based Budgeting
Bryant recommends passage of the Smart Budget Act which would incorporate Performance Based Budgeting. For more information about Performance Based Budgeting see MEPC’s recent blog series on the subject.

Keep Medicaid Funding Level Despite Projected Increase in Participants
Governor Bryant recommends level funding for Medicaid. However, more participants will likely necessitate either cuts in services provided or cuts to reimbursement rates for providers.

Cuts for Education
Governor Bryant recommends a $72.9 million reduction in state funds for the Mississippi Adequate Education Program. Both Governor Barbour’s and the JLBC budget recommended level funding for MAEP. None of the budgets recommend full funding for the formula that allocates state funding across the state’s school districts. Bryant explains the reduction by suggesting that school districts use their own reserve funds to make up for the cut. School district fund balances are used for cash flow throughout the district’s fiscal year due to irregular funding schedules and for capital expenses. Furthermore, the amount held by schools districts vary greatly from district to district. Intending to address this concern, the Governor recommends only $6 million for an emergency loan fund for school districts with inadequate reserves.

While some of Bryant’s recommendations would improve revenue collection and make the budget process more straightforward, many of the recommendations would continue the “cuts-only” approach of the last administration. A balanced approach that includes new revenue would help the state invest in education and workforce development—both important for the state’s prosperity in the future.

Author: Sara Miller, Senior Policy Analyst

Comments (0)

Budget Reform with Performance Based Budgeting, Part Two

January 31, 2012

Filed under: Budget & Tax,Budget Reform,Performance Based Budgeting — Tags: budget, evaluate performance, funding decisions, Mississippi, performance based budgeting, programs, public programs, smart budget act, tax, tax expenditures — admin @ 8:17 AM

Last week, in part one of our examination of budget reform, we discussed some of the basics of Performance Based Budgeting. This week, we will outline some concerns about the how Performance Based Budgeting might be implemented.

Performance Based Budgeting aims to collect and evaluate performance data on programs and use that data to inform funding decisions. However, its effectiveness much depends on how a program’s performance is defined and how the data collected are used.

First, the standards by which public programs are measured should be crafted with public input and with acknowledgement of the outside factors influencing their results.

By their very nature, state agencies deal with complex problems, often with multiple influencing factors and without easy ways to measure results.

Second, budgeting decisions should continue to be based primarily on public needs and priorities.

While the budget process is not always smooth, the reason budget decisions are made by our legislature is because they reflect the priorities of the public through representative government. The most “successful” programs may not be the priority programs or vice versa. Would one want to cut public safety spending, because the crime rate went up?

Third, after years of budget cuts, how does one account for the chronic underfunding of programs contributing to an agency’s shortcomings?

Many programs have had year after year of budget cuts. The Mississippi Adequate Education Program is in line to be underfunded by about $1 Billion since it was last fully funded in 2008. Responsible implementation of Performance Based Budgeting would take into account lower funding levels and their impact on a program’s performance.

Finally, Performance Based Budgeting, if implemented, should be applied to all state programs, including those administered through the tax code, like economic development tax breaks.

Performance Based Budgeting is designed to judge the effectiveness of programs funded through the appropriations process. However, tax expenditures and incentives should also be reviewed for their effectiveness. They are enacted for a public purpose but are not regularly reviewed and in most cases data are not available to the public about how they are used.

Performance Based Budgeting can be used to inform the budget process and to improve budget transparency. It should not however replace public budget deliberations that take into account the needs and priorities of the people.

In the final post from this three part series, we will look at how Performance Based Budgeting is being used in other states.

Author: Sara Miler, Senior Policy Analyst

Comments (0)

INTRODUCING THE STATE OF WORKING MISSISSIPPI 2012

January 25, 2012

Many communities across Mississippi continued to experience persistently high unemployment and underemployment, stagnant wages and economic insecurity. However, the state’s workforce remains resilient and continues to be one of the state’s greatest assets. Understanding how workers, industries and families have been affected over the last decade can lay a foundation for building up the workforce in the years ahead.

MEPC’s latest report, State of Working Mississippi 2012 is a comprehensive piece that looks at key aspects of the economy affecting Mississippi’s workforce from 2000 to the present. Specifically the report:

Inspects changes in critical areas of Mississippi’s economy since 2000 including: jobs, the workforce, wages, income, and state revenue.
Compares information in these areas with trends nationally and among Mid South states.
Examines each of these areas through the lens of race, gender and educational attainment.
Summarizes key takeaways and makes recommendations in each chapter for advancing working Mississippians and their families.

SELECT FINDINGS FROM STATE OF WORKING MISSISSIPPI 2012

TWO RECESSIONS RESULT IN JOB LOSS OVER THE DECADE

In Mississippi, employment peaked in February 2008 and then steeply declined until February 2010. In total, Mississippi lost 76,800 jobs over the two-year period. Mississippi’s job losses in the 2000s appear particularly harsh when compared to the prosperity of the 1990s. Mississippi’s employment grew by almost 25% during the 1990s, in contrast to a 5.5% decline in the 2000s. The Southern region and the United States experienced similar job growth during the 1990s; however, neither the South nor the nation experienced the same level of overall decline in employment in the 2000s.

MISSISSIPPI WORKERS EXPERIENCE LITTLE CHANGE IN WAGES

Many members of the state’s workforce have not seen an improvement in their wages since 2000, as companies were hit hard by two economic downturns, and state and local budgets tightened. The inflation-adjusted median wage in Mississippi grew marginally from 2000 to 2010, from $13.13 to $13.45. The gap between men’s and women’s wages narrowed over the decade, while the wage gap between white and African American workers persisted from 2000 to 2010.

WORKFORCE ADVANCES IN EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Mississippi’s workforce advanced in educational attainment over the decade, but needs to raise skill levels further to reach national norms. In 2000, 20.8% of the workforce received a bachelor’s degree or higher compared to 22.8% in 2010. Overall 57.1% of the state’s workforce has taken at least some college classes. However, over 350,000 working-age adults still lack a high school degree, and the share of workers without high school equivalency is larger in Mississippi than in the U.S.

Over the next several days we will take a closer look at the key findings and recommendations from each chapter of the report.

Author: Sarah Welker, Policy Analyst

Comments (1)

Budget Reform with Performance Based Budgeting

January 24, 2012

Filed under: Budget & Tax — Tags: budget, Mississippi, performance based budgeting, smart budget act — admin @ 8:01 AM

With the beginning of the legislative session and change in executive leadership, there has been renewed talk of state budget reform. Budget reform is necessary to improve the transparency of the process and to increase budget accountability.

One proposed reform includes Performance Based Budgeting. Performance Based Budgeting reforms aim to use data about the effectiveness of programs to inform budget decisions. Performance Based Budgeting can accomplish some of these goals. Budgeting is complicated, however, and any reform should be made with care.
In this three-part blog series on Performance Based Budgeting, we will delve into those issues. In part one we will go over a few basics about Performance Based Budgeting.

Performance Based Budget reforms seek to collect and evaluate performance data on programs and use that data to inform funding decisions. There are a wide range of budget reforms that can fall under a performance based budgeting system.

According to the National Association of State Budget Officers, twenty five states use some kind of performance budgeting. Mississippi currently collects some performance information that is reported by state agencies to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee annually on their agency budget request.

Last year, the State Senate passed the Mississippi Smart Budget Act (SB 2301) that would have implemented some performance based budgeting reforms. However, the bill was not passed in the House. It is likely that a similar bill will be introduced during this legislative session.

The next blog post in this series will explore some challenges to the implementation of effective Performance Based Budgeting and some concepts/questions that should be considered if it is to be implemented in a constructive manner.

Read my opinion piece on this in the Hattiesburg American.

Budget Reform with Performance Based Budgeting, Part Two

Author: Sara Miller, Senior Policy Analyst

Comments (0)

Legislative Economic Briefing Highlights

January 20, 2012

Filed under: Budget & Tax — Tags: employment, federal expenditures, general fund, jobs losss, Legislative Economic Briefing, Mississippi — admin @ 8:13 AM

Thursday, the Mississippi Legislature was briefed by the state economist and the state treasurer on the state’s current economic growth, employment, General Fund revenue, bonding and future outlook.

Below are 4 key points made by State Economist Dr. Darrin Webb during the Legislative Economic Briefing at the Capitol on January 19^th.

Mississippi’s overall employment is not projected to reach 2000 levels until 2016. The state still has 55,000 fewer jobs than it did at the employment peak in February 2008.
Many communities continue to experience challenges after the recession. Forty-six Mississippi counties lost jobs from 2010 to 2011.
Mississippi’s General Fund collections are still down after the recession, and state revenue will not pass FY2008 levels for several years.
Federal expenditures represent 1 out of every 3 dollars of Mississippi’s economy.

FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO SLOW GROWTH IN MISSISSIPPI

Dr. Webb placed particular emphasis on a number of reasons why the state is projected to have slower growth than the nation in coming years. The first was the state’s larger than average share of resources coming from federal dollars. Federal expenditures are not likely to increase substantially in the years ahead and could face cuts. Mississippi’s economy will be influenced by the lack of federal growth more than other states.

Additionally, human capital was mentioned as another weakness that will affect the state’s growth and competitiveness. Without the further development of a skilled and healthy working population, Mississippi’s ability to maintain and attract businesses will be hindered.

PATHWAYS TO RAISING ECONOMIC GROWTH AND OPPORTUNITY

The information provided today raises the urgency to pursue policies that increase growth and build adequate state revenue. Investing in pathways to increase educational attainment remains critical at all levels of the education spectrum.

Equally pressing is the need to consider a balanced approach that includes raising revenue instead of a cuts only approach to ensure that Mississippi has the resources needed to enhance the delivery of education from workforce training to secondary schools and post-secondary institutions.

LEGISLATIVE ECONOMIC BRIEFING (printable pdf)

Author: Sarah Welker, Policy Analyst

Comments (0)

Part 3: A State Earned Income Tax Credit – Estimated Cost, Eligibility, and Encouraging & Rewarding Work

January 18, 2012

Filed under: Budget & Tax,EITC — Tags: Earned Income Tax Credit, EITC, household income, Mississippi — admin @ 9:32 AM

The previous posts addressed the increasing gap between the state tax threshold and the federal poverty line and introduced a state Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) as a potential solution. This post will explain more about instituting a state EITC in Mississippi.

Estimated Cost
The cost of a State EITC in Mississippi depends upon the percent of the federal EITC selected for the credit. Most states’ EITC provide benefits as a set percentage of what the federal program pays. The table below includes the estimated cost of a state EITC in Mississippi.

Who Is Eligible, and For How Much?
In the 2011 tax year, over 26 million working families and individuals received the federal EITC—including 404,394 Mississippians. The amount of the EITC depends on a recipient’s income, marital status, and number of children (See figure below). Each tier of benefits rises with earned income until it reaches a maximum level and then begins to phase out at higher income levels. For example, the highest credit amount of $5,751 is for married filers with three or more children and a household income between $13,000 and $21,000, while the highest credit amount for married filers with one child is $3,094.

Encouraging and Rewarding Work
The EITC is designed to promote and reward work. Only families with at least one member in the workforce are eligible for the credit. Starting with the first dollar, a worker’s EITC grows with each additional dollar of earnings until the credit reaches the maximum value. The amount of the credit rises as income increases until it reaches a maximum amount and then begins to phase out at higher income levels. This “phasing out” effect ensures that a family does not lose its EITC benefit based on a single dollar of income. Research has shown that most families use the EITC to pay for necessities, home repairs, maintaining/replacing vehicles needed to commute to work, and obtaining additional education or training to boost their employability and earning power.¹

Our next post will discuss additional benefits of a state EITC and address policy specific recommendations for making our state’s income tax system more equitable.

Author: Francinia D. McKeithan, Policy Analyst/ SFAI Policy Fellow

¹Timothy M. Smeeding, Katherin Ross Phillips, and Michael A. O’Connor, The Earned Income Tax Credit: Expectation, Knowledge, Use, and Economic and Social Mobility. http://ideas.repec.org/p/max/cprwps/13.html

Comments (0)

Part 2: Making Mississippi’s Income Tax More Equitable—The Earned Income Tax Credit

January 13, 2012

Filed under: Budget & Tax,EITC,Income & Working Families,Income Tax — Tags: Earned Income Tax Credit, Federal Poverty Line, income tax, Mississippi, Regressive Tax System — admin @ 10:11 AM

Our first post addressed the increasing gap between the state tax threshold and the federal poverty line. One policy solution that would reduce the effect of the state income tax on the poor is for our state to institute an Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC).

The federal EITC is the nation’s most effective anti-poverty program for working families.¹ It is designed to encourage and reward work as well as offset federal payroll and income taxes. In 2009, it lifted 6.5 million people above the federal poverty line—including 3.3 million children, nationally. Additionally, the federal EITC is refundable, meaning that if it exceeds a low wage worker’s income tax liability, the IRS will refund the balance.

404,394 Mississippians claimed the federal EITC in 2011 which brought an additional $1.5 billion into our state.² A state EITC would reduce the income taxes owed and provide a wage supplement for over 360,000 working families living in or near poverty in Mississippi. Finally, a state EITC that is tied to the federal EITC is automatically adjusted.

The next blog in this series will talk about the estimated cost and eligibility requirements for a state EITC while also describing the work benefits that an EITC could create in our state.

Author: Francinia D. McKeithan, Policy Analyst/ SFAI Policy Fellow

¹EITC Statistics http://www.eitc.irs.gov/central/eitcstats/

²Arloc Sherman, “Stimulus Keeping 6 Million Americans Out of Poverty in 2009, Estimates Show,” Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, September 9, 2009.

Comments (0)

Making Mississippi’s Income Tax More Equitable

January 11, 2012

Filed under: Budget & Tax,Income & Working Families,Income Tax — Tags: Federal Poverty Line, income tax, Mississippi, regressive, Tax System — admin @ 9:08 AM

Mississippi’s state income tax threshold, the amount at which persons start having to pay income taxes, has fallen below the federal poverty line since 2005 (See Figure 1, below).

Each year, the federal poverty line increases due to increases in the cost of living. However, Mississippi’s income tax threshold does not adjust for inflation.

Without adjustment, the gap between the state’s income tax threshold and the federal poverty line will increase annually. In turn, there will be more individuals living below the federal poverty line that will be required to pay state income taxes.

This blog is the first of a series of posts on the state’s tax system. Forthcoming posts will include policy solutions to address the growing regressive nature of the state’s income tax system.

Author: Francinia D. McKeithan, Policy Analyst/ SFAI Policy Fellow

Part 2: Making Mississippi’s Income Tax More Equitable—The Earned Income Tax Credit

Part 3: A State Earned Income Tax Credit – Estimated Cost, Eligibility, and Encouraging & Rewarding Work

Comments (0)

A Year in Numbers: Important Facts From 2011

December 29, 2011

Filed under: Basic Economic Security,Budget & Tax — Tags: Economic Security, Education Cuts, Jobs, Poverty, Unemployment, Wages — admin @ 8:51 AM

As 2011 comes to a close, we have an opportunity to step back and take a clearer view of Mississippi’s economic outlook for the future.

2011 By The Numbers
The table below provides six key numbers from 2011that underscore the importance of continued work in 2012 to advance the economic security of Mississippi’s working families.

Each of these data points underscores the reality that working families in Mississippi face numerous challenges to achieving economic security and prosperity. These barriers require attention.

Throughout 2011, weak job growth; stagnant wages and rising costs have meant that too many workers and their families face economic hardship. Actions that stimulate job growth, provide additional access to quality education and support working families falling short of economic security remain vital in the year ahead.

Author: Sarah Welker, Policy Analyst

Sources
1 Bureau of Labor Statistics. Regional and State Employment and Unemployment.
2 Ibid.
3 Miller, Sara. Executive Budget Recommendation: State Moving Into Fifth Year of Cuts Only Approach. Mississippi Economic Policy Center. Policy Matters Blog. December 27, 2011.
4 Economic Policy Institute analysis of CPS data.
5 Basic Economic Security Tables for Mississippi.
6 Kids Count Data Center.

Comments (0)

Executive Budget Recommendation: State Moving Into Fifth Year of Cuts Only Approach

December 27, 2011

Filed under: Budget & Tax,FY 2013 — Tags: 2013 budget recommendation, Balanced Approach, General Funds, Revenue — admin @ 10:32 AM

The final Executive Budget Recommendation (EBR) from Governor Barbour who leaves office in a few weeks was released December 21^st.

The table below shows the budget recommendation for state support funds in FY 2013 compared with FY 2012.

FY 2013 Executive Budget Recommendation for State Support Funds Compared with FY 2012

Total state support funds under the recommendation are $6 Million below FY 2012 appropriations. The expiration of federal recovery act dollars and the absence of new revenues contributed to the need to cut budgets.

On education line items, the Governor’s budget includes a recommendation for over $40 Million in cuts to MAEP—the statutory K-12 school funding formula. Higher education, including Universities and Community Colleges, is recommended for cuts of over $25Million.

The Department of Mental Health is recommended for cuts totaling only $3.5 Million. However, the Governor suggests these cuts be made by closing four mental health facilities and six crisis centers. The Governor recommends $7 Million in additional funding to transition services to community based programs.

Larger percentage cuts are recommended for Conservation Programs, Agricultural Programs, and the Mississippi Arts Commission. Most other categories are recommended for cuts between 1.5-3%. Those cuts do not seem as dramatic as the others, but they are recommended for programs that have endured year-after-year of budget cuts.

Despite the cuts approach, the EBR does make several notable recommendations to support at risk and working families. Specifically, recommendations to fully fund the Olivia Y settlement – a lawsuit that was settled due to problems identified within the child welfare system – and to increase student financial aid by $2.6 million are strong recommendations that should be followed in the next administration. Additionally, the common sense recommendation to increase the number of auditors at the Department of Revenue, if followed, will bring in more revenue by enhancing collection efforts.

At the end of the day, however, the state is moving into its fifth year of cuts. The cuts are coming as federal resources for recovery and reinvestment begin to go away. Furthermore, deficit reduction talks at the federal level suggest a long term erosion of federal support for state programs – a move that leaves Mississippi particularly exposed given its reliance on federal funding. To preserve the quality of and access to state services that are vital to moving the state forward a balanced approach, instead of a cuts only approach is needed.

Look for further analysis of both the legislative and executive budget recommendations in the coming weeks as we prepare for the legislative session.

Author: Sara Miller, Senior Policy Analyst

Comments (1)

Older Posts »